REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
Toy Story 3 ended perfectly. I was happy with shorts. There was zero need to continue things.
A "love story". Woody better not be finding love.
I imagine they want to cash in on the name but don't want to alienate the people who watched the first three and are satisfied with the trilogy. Though, they should name it something else.If they plan on doing a standalone story why don't they just call it something else?
Actually, Anagram, it's not that someone on the team had good sense. This no doubt has been in the planning stages for a long time and this would have been decided way before they announced it. The LA Times even said this idea was concieved two years ago;Thank glob. Someone on that team had good sense.
Over the last two years Lasseter and Stanton wrote a treatment and pulled in other writers, including Rashida Jones and Will McCormack after seeing their 2012 comedy "Celeste and Jesse Forever," about a divorcing couple who try to remain friends.
“We love these characters so much; they are like family to us,” said Lasseter. “We don’t want to do anything with them unless it lives up to or surpasses what’s gone before. Toy Story 3 ended Woody and Buzz’s story with Andy so perfectly that for a long time, we never even talked about doing another Toy Story movie. But when Andrew, Pete, Lee and I came up with this new idea, I just could not stop thinking about it. It was so exciting to me, I knew we had to make this movie—and I wanted to direct it myself.”
Where it's implied that the only relevance it has to Toy Story 3 is that it takes place soon after that film in the timeline.Lasseter told The Times that "Toy Story 4" will be a love story and will pick up where "Toy Story 3" left off, when Woody, Buzz Lightyear and the rest of the series' toy chest of characters were handed down to a little girl named Bonnie.
"A lot of people in the industry view us doing sequels as being for the business of it, but for us it's pure passion," said Lasseter, who directed the first two "Toy Story" films. "We only make sequels when we have a story that's as good as or better than the original.
"We don't just, because of the success of a film, automatically say we're going to do a sequel and then figure out what we're going to do."
There's literally no fucking reason for this to ruin the "beautiful ending" in Toy Story 3, especially since we've have two TV specials and a few shorts set after that ending (and did those ruin the "beautiful ending"? No, they did not.)Wait, so there is still a chance it could feature the original toys? Ugh, my hype just went down again. I don't care if the writers have a good idea for the fourth film. Another film with the main toys would RUIN the beautiful ending in Toy Story 3
[Toy Story 4 will] only have tertiary ties to the original trilogy starring Buzz Lightyear and Woody.
Wait, so there is still a chance it could feature the original toys? Ugh, my hype just went down again. I don't care if the writers have a good idea for the fourth film. Another film with the main toys would RUIN the beautiful ending in Toy Story 3