It was always to my knowledge that a living woman had more rights than an unborn fetus.
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
It was always to my knowledge that a living woman had more rights than an unborn fetus.
I think it's utter rubbish that we take away the fetus' life because of the "rights of the mother". Besides, it's not like the child isn't dependent on the parents after it leaves the womb. I mean, you can say anything at all to explain why it isn't a "person with rights"; but that doesn't change the fact that we know what it is and what the implications of abortion are.
I think it's utter rubbish that we take away the fetus' life because of the "rights of the mother". Besides, it's not like the child isn't dependent on the parents after it leaves the womb. I mean, you can say anything at all to explain why it isn't a "person with rights"; but that doesn't change the fact that we know what it is and what the implications of abortion are.
I think it's utter rubbish that we take away the fetus' life because of the "rights of the mother". Besides, it's not like the child isn't dependent on the parents after it leaves the womb. I mean, you can say anything at all to explain why it isn't a "person with rights"; but that doesn't change the fact that we know what it is and what the implications of abortion are.
It was always to my knowledge that a living woman had more rights than an unborn fetus.
Sure there are cases where abortion might be the safest option for everyone involved, but in cases where women are just like "oh shit I forgot to use protection, now I have this baby! Gotta kill it"? Fuck them.
Because most abortions are totally like that.
You're talking about the right to kill a human being.
As I said. It has no rights. All it is from a moral standpoint; a grey area. I say it has no rights. You say it has rights. But as of its currently stand, I'm right in this matter because frankly, the fetus has no rights.
To all those who say 'abortion is murder' and such, you are wrong.
What you are destroying is a zygote, a diploid cell (or group of cells) with the potential to carry life. Comparing this with murder is exactly like saying everytime a man ejaculates and fails to conceive (safe sex, masturbation, wet dreams) or everytime a women ovulates and fails to conceive, they are murderers. Seeing as all of these result in a haploid or diploid cell with the potential to create life being destroyed.
That's right kiddies..
If abortion = murder, then women kill every month and I kill everynight before bed.
Conception/post-conception and pre-conception are hardly the same thing.
From a perfectly biological standpoint, the only difference is a half set of chromosomes.
Either way, the cells have potential to create life, but are not living.
Except that we know what it'll lead to, and I find that reality pretty bloody important.
Uh, no you don't.
As I said before zygotes with potential to carry life =\= human life
assuming that a zygote is human life, that would make our sperm cells and egg cells also human life (which would make it murder every time a woman gets her period).
Also, the zygote does not do the seven life processes meaning it can't be classified as living.
We also know what it will lead to if the egg doesn't conceive, it'll pass on and a chance to create life would be destroyed. That's exactly what an abortion is. The chance to create life destroyed. Either way, it doesn't make a difference. Neither them, nor the zygote, are living.