REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
[video=youtube;rxjOFd0YNo0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxjOFd0YNo0[/video]
Trailer up now.
I'll post thoughts on the demo if it ever appears in my store.
This is freaking terrafying.[video=youtube;rxjOFd0YNo0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxjOFd0YNo0[/video]
Trailer up now.
I'll post thoughts on the demo if it ever appears in my store.
Resident Evil doesn't need zombies to be Resident Evil though. There's a reason why it's called Biohazard in Japan and by the developers. I'm all for any kind of mutations. It's the execution that hasn't always been very good. Like RE5 and RE6.
And when I asked would we see any familiar faces – Chris, Jill, Leon – or the nefarious Umbrella Corp?
"Basically no. It’s a whole new set of characters and situations," said Kawata, who has worked on the franchise since 2005's Resident Evil 4.
RE0 is one of the worst games in the series, imo. Yes, it's pretty and looks like a classic RE game. But it still has a bad plot and the gameplay is tedious. Not to mention the enemy designs. At the time, I think most fans agreed that this was a clear sign that Capcom had run out of ideas and it also made people more open to the change of pace with RE4. Unfortunately, that game is now getting some hate simply because people blame it for RE5 and RE6. I firmly believe that if RE5 and RE6 had both been more like RE4, Lost in Nightmares and Revelations 2, people would think more fondly of modern RE and not glorify everything that predates RE4 - because RE0 is clearly not on par with RE1-3, or even Code Veronica (which I also think is a very mixed bag).