REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS
15 total points. You think that scoring 15 total points mean they are great offenses. Yeah they have good defense, but thats all they talk about.You're an idiot. They don't have horrible offenses. They have the best 2 defenses in the nation. And it's defense that wins championships, offense just sells the tickets.
Yes. That's just how dominant their defenses are. Name an offense in this nation, and I'll show you a team they can both shut down. Easily.15 total points. You think that scoring 15 total points mean they are great offenses. Yeah they have good defense, but thats all they talk about.
Yeah you tell me that tey have great defense but thats the point. Everyone talks about the defenses like it is the only thing they have and completly ignored the offenses that had 15 total points, 4 missed field goals, 4 turnovers, and 8-24 on third downs.Yes. That's just how dominant their defenses are. Name an offense in this nation, and I'll show you a team they can both shut down. Easily.
You're not getting bruh. No one's ignoring the offenses. The reason for the low-score wasn't because of an abysmal offensive showing. It was both teams defenses. If you don't understand it, there's no simpler way to put it. You're just lost. This is part of the reason why the SEC catches so much flack. The nation at large hates to see an SEC champ because year after year, we have the best defenses that nation has to offer. We get matched against so-called "offensive powerhouses" and we make them look like little league teams. Oregon? Texas? Psh, please. Nothin. So keep harping on about our "poor" offenses while we enjoy our dominance over college football. And Trent Richardson, the best RB in the nation, says hi.Yeah you tell me that tey have great defense but thats the point. Everyone talks about the defenses like it is the only thing they have and completly ignored the offenses that had 15 total points, 4 missed field goals, 4 turnovers, and 8-24 on third downs.
More or less the point I'm trying to make to Twilightheaven, who seems to think Bama and LSU merely have poor offenses. As if.If you have a badass defensive line, it won't matter if your team's offense sucks eggies (and usually they don't? D8), because your defense will stop plays, get some picks & grab fumbles, and trololol the enemy offensive line until the game ends.
None taken since I agree about the QB. But Bama has always managed to do big numbers despite them lacking in such a crucial position. They've had the likes of Ingram, Richardson, Arenas, Jones (my cousin), etc. but no all-star QB, yet they still manage to do damage on a scoreboard. To me, that speaks volumes towards how good they are offensively; imagine what they would do if they had someone like Cam Newton, or Tim Tebow, etc.Well I'll put it this way if LSU or Bama had horrible offenses I guess LSU wouldn't put up 40 against Oregon or what was 41 against West VA and Arkansas too.
Plus not to leave Bama out they put up 42 against Auburn just last weekend. Thing about Alabama though is no offense to you XIII Heartless their offfense isn't as great as most people think the RB and a few WR's are great same for the offensive line, but that QB I know for a fact he isn't as good as a few QB's around the SEC.
Do you really think the game would even be close if USC touched the field with Bama or LSU? A blowout is even more boring than a defensive standoff like LSU and Alabama had. Get real.Admittedly that was the most boring game I've watched in a long time. I believe that if USC wasn't on suspension they would definitely be in the talk despite losing out to Stanford in OT.
Pac-12 for life