- Joined
- Feb 17, 2006
- Messages
- 13,786
- Awards
- 2
- Location
- Somewhere with headphones on d-_-b
- Website
- profile.myspace.com
As if the SEC needed any solidification. But you're right.
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
You're an idiot. They don't have horrible offenses. They have the best 2 defenses in the nation. And it's defense that wins championships, offense just sells the tickets.
15 total points. You think that scoring 15 total points mean they are great offenses. Yeah they have good defense, but thats all they talk about.
Yes. That's just how dominant their defenses are. Name an offense in this nation, and I'll show you a team they can both shut down. Easily.
Yeah you tell me that tey have great defense but thats the point. Everyone talks about the defenses like it is the only thing they have and completly ignored the offenses that had 15 total points, 4 missed field goals, 4 turnovers, and 8-24 on third downs.
If you have a badass defensive line, it won't matter if your team's offense sucks eggies (and usually they don't? D8), because your defense will stop plays, get some picks & grab fumbles, and trololol the enemy offensive line until the game ends.
More or less the point I'm trying to make to Twilightheaven, who seems to think Bama and LSU merely have poor offenses. As if.
Well I'll put it this way if LSU or Bama had horrible offenses I guess LSU wouldn't put up 40 against Oregon or what was 41 against West VA and Arkansas too.
Plus not to leave Bama out they put up 42 against Auburn just last weekend. Thing about Alabama though is no offense to you XIII Heartless their offfense isn't as great as most people think the RB and a few WR's are great same for the offensive line, but that QB I know for a fact he isn't as good as a few QB's around the SEC.
Admittedly that was the most boring game I've watched in a long time. I believe that if USC wasn't on suspension they would definitely be in the talk despite losing out to Stanford in OT.
Pac-12 for life