Being lazy would be the same as being an idiot there.
But it's only stupid from a utilitarian perspective, we're not sure what kind of principles he was operating on.
For instance, Batman's choice not to kill, while a nice ideal, can have some hefty repercussions.
If you could kill one person to save a hundred, would you do it? It would seem "stupid" not to, but from a deontological point of view, killing is wrong in any scenario, and so you shouldn't.
But it's only stupid from a utilitarian perspective, we're not sure what kind of principles he was operating on.
For instance, Batman's choice not to kill, while a nice ideal, can have some hefty repercussions.
If you could kill one person to save a hundred, would you do it? It would seem "stupid" not to, but from a deontological point of view, killing is wrong in any scenario, and so you shouldn't.