Okay, so I made a new thread for this because I felt it was off topic in other threads. I'm sure I'm not original in thinking this, but that's why I want to hear the answers that arrive.
Miracles. They are "good"* things. Us humans can't explain how they happened without some higher power. So God.
Horrible events. Such as Genocides and natural events; bad things. If humans can't explain why they happened, or even if they can, that doesn't mean God did it. Because he doesn't mess with free will/ is a benevolent God. If they are one of those that give equal credit to God for all events, then there are rationalizations such as 'God did this so that in the future good events will happen because of the butterfly effect'.
For one, this sounds crazy to me. And two, how can God invoke a miracle without messing with freewill? Three, if you are one of those rationalizers (or not), please correct me. I would like to see these things I wrote proven wrong. It would make me a little more satisfied to see that one of the most prominent religions in the world isn't so fallacious.
* Quotations are there because a miracle such as a baby being miraculously saved from near death, could mean the death of a whole race if that baby grew up to be a man such as Hitler. Or a miracle to a poor family that are very devout Christians receiving 1,000,000 dollars could mean that the check was given to them by a drunk wealthy man that needed that money badly. Or maybe Jesus' miracle of rising from the dead could have driven several people mad, making them commit suicide or turn them into sociopaths in the end.
Miracles. They are "good"* things. Us humans can't explain how they happened without some higher power. So God.
Horrible events. Such as Genocides and natural events; bad things. If humans can't explain why they happened, or even if they can, that doesn't mean God did it. Because he doesn't mess with free will/ is a benevolent God. If they are one of those that give equal credit to God for all events, then there are rationalizations such as 'God did this so that in the future good events will happen because of the butterfly effect'.
For one, this sounds crazy to me. And two, how can God invoke a miracle without messing with freewill? Three, if you are one of those rationalizers (or not), please correct me. I would like to see these things I wrote proven wrong. It would make me a little more satisfied to see that one of the most prominent religions in the world isn't so fallacious.
* Quotations are there because a miracle such as a baby being miraculously saved from near death, could mean the death of a whole race if that baby grew up to be a man such as Hitler. Or a miracle to a poor family that are very devout Christians receiving 1,000,000 dollars could mean that the check was given to them by a drunk wealthy man that needed that money badly. Or maybe Jesus' miracle of rising from the dead could have driven several people mad, making them commit suicide or turn them into sociopaths in the end.