Why do you even care? It's a virtual fame system. Stop blowing it out of proportion.
the only reason i put it up, was because i thought a negative rep
was for doing something wrong aside from just the way you "type",
and if that was never the case then it really doesn't do anything
but make the situation worse, especially for ppl who don't understand
its actual basis. I don't personally care about the rep so much as any
hate i develop in this forum, but the point is, why negarep someone
when you can simply reply to them about something so insignificant.
It's hard to explain this while letting people know that i actually don't
care, but i put that negarep in my sig, because i thought that first it
was a sign of abuse, to see if i'd try to argue back at Stavvy, and that
second it was pointless because it didn't pertain to the common negarep,
but reading the replies further down now i understand....or at least i think
i understand how negarep can be used, and the problem it is supposedly
creating.
To be fair, it was annoying how you'd post in incoherent, cut up paragraphs. It wasn't so much as what you said, but rather how. So I find the rep to be justified.
that's fine dude, i have no qualms with you. I just didn't think that i could get
negarepped for the way i type. "maybe for things i said/did, but not for how i
place my typing...or text(?) knowwhatimean?
it's really ridiculous you have to parade around a nega-rep like it's the most brutal stain to your impeccable reputation.
that's fine, at least your reason is more subtle aside from the cursing. I've had
negarep before the whole rep wiping plan a while back, and i didn't flaunt them around,
because i thought they made perfect sense. I'm not flawless, nor am i, just as anyone
else here incapable of receiving negative rep if not, a negative response, and everything
else is explained in the response to VersionX. I have no qualms with your decision and
opinion either.