KH 358/2 Days Review
- Thread starter BluesStar21
- Start date
|
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
|
- Status
So you live in Japan where they rate games on a scale from 1 to 400?Wow.
BTW they reviewed it waaaaay too early.but thanks
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 17
- Age
- 28
ive played the game and for me its a 10/10
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2009
- Messages
- 4
I noticed that the Nintendo Power one is actually just a preview. I write for a gaming site, and one of our writers has had some hands on time with the game, and as an avid KH fan, I'd suggest you check it out for a full perspective of the game. You can read it here: No More Game Blogs - Previews - Hands-on: Kingdom Hearts 358/2 Days - DS
I mean, I could be a little biased... but, really? You'd think if you were reviewing a game that takes place in the middle of a series you'd do a little research before hand (in terms of what Roxas is, that the Days mean the number of Days in the Organization--both of which become apparent through gameplay, anyway).
And then he/she goes on to write about four paragraphs on how the game uses to many /, ~, ., etc.. How is that a helpful review?
Meh.
And then he/she goes on to write about four paragraphs on how the game uses to many /, ~, ., etc.. How is that a helpful review?
Meh.
Well I do have to admit it looks repetitive when enemies take forever to kill.
You mean, it is the first KH game with any hint of difficulty in it.
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2009
- Messages
- 282
I personally think the story line is kind of boring, but I'm only really there to play as the organization members and well the gameplay kicks butt too, so yeah gameplay too.
Nah, if you pace them and beat like 3 per day. They would not get annoying, at least for me.
Yeah, listening to reviewers' opinions is kinda dumb actually. You are the one who is gonna pay the money and play the game; at the end is your opinion what matters. Reviewers are a bunch of free-loadres
Yeah, listening to reviewers' opinions is kinda dumb actually. You are the one who is gonna pay the money and play the game; at the end is your opinion what matters. Reviewers are a bunch of free-loadres
What? Reviewers are necessary in the gaming industry. It's for people to instruct them on what's good and what's bad, and whether it's worth it or not. They inform you whether to buy it or not.
Jesus, Don't treat reviewers like free-loaders. They go through hell of a lot of games and have to write a review for [very] low pay. And people like you treat them like they are free-loaders and their opinion don't matter. I actually take insult to that, you twat.
[spam]Bawww, that is my opinion; if you do not like it then sue me.Like I care how much of an insult you take[spam].
If you rather buy a game influenced by somebody else's opinion then be my guest; but other people think different.
Eh, they arnt the industry's knights in shining armor either, they generally love their jobs because they get to play games for free.
A
Azrael
Guest
What, those upset KHtards who been crying at a eight? If anything goes by, I rather listen to the reviewer than the fantards who's crying at a high score of 8 because their shitty series is getting bashed.
Maybe, but after a while, the novelty wears off. Then they either get bribed by a publisher or review it honestly. Not every reviewer is the white knight, I agree. But there are some who are honest at what they do.
- Status