The difference between keyblades with/without chains
- Thread starter RueLi
- Start date
|
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
|
- Status
It isn't evn artificial, its data that DiZ "programmed" it for him.
Who knows exactly why she has a keyblade in the first place? And again Riku could be wrong for all we know.
That was because the object he was using was data, thus the reason why it had encoding circles around it. It wasn't an artificial keyblade.
That is because the KK is the keyblades true form, in KH2, tihs is stated under the description for the Defender keychain.
i know, but it didnt say it was the original form, maybe the original wasnt to its true power until the charm was permanently attached
... Its original form is its true form.
well....we have no proof of that.
its like saying sora was the true chosen one, although riku was the original chosen one
The original for of the keyblade would be its first form, correct? Well, the first form of the keyblade is the Kingdom Key, which is the true form of the keyblade. Therefore, Keyblade's true form = Keyblade's original form. And the Keyblade goes to whomever has the strongest heart, not who its current weilder wishes to be their successor, which is why it goes back in forth between Sora and Riku during KH1. And, Sora and Riku both have keyblades, therefor they are both "chosen ones"
And in the kh2 trailer it has the "chasers" text all over it, i'ved tried the dictionary and it says like a blacksmith or the one who forges metals. Imo, this chasers are the ones who create TAV's keyblades (dont know if it is fake or something).
The chasers more likely refers to the fact that TAV are chasing MX; it could have a deeper meaning but I wouldn't think too much of it right now.
original keyblade would be the first you are correct, but that doesnt mean its first form wasnt put out to its full potential (true form)
understand?
or what if they simply remove the chain to give it a lesser type to train to being able to weild the true form?
dont see how it contradicts the theory knowing which came first, the chain or the blade
the theory can still hold by saying TAV's keyblade is KK, mickeys KK, WtD without keychains
who said the keyblade isnt detachable?
Last edited:
Actually, I read somewhere that the keyblade's power/potential is determined by the strength of its weilders heart. That being said, the keyblade's power/potential is liimitless. And what theory are you referring to?
my theory is TAV's keyblade are SRM's keyblade without the keychan regardless which one was original or true
A
Audo
Guest
No he never.
Maybe. We don't know for sure if it is or not. Just because Riku seems to think so, doesn't mean it really is.
It wasn't an artificial Keyblade. It wasn't even a Keyblade at all. It was comprised of data.
Unless you can provide any evidence, I shall call that an uneducated guess, not a theory.
Um.. the KK is a keyblade from the realm of light, a legendary keyblade considering. So yes, KK is its true form. It's real, and the true form is with the keychain on it, not without.
And I'm guessing some of that conjecture came from the secret ending? Well it was just symbolism, add to the fact that Mickey has a keyblade at that time. Though that does raise the question of continuity, since Mickey goes on his adventure to find the Inverse KK during KH, how does he have the Star Seeker in BBS?
A
Audo
Guest
We already know that to be false given that SRM have all of their Keyblades in KH2 while Aqua's Keyblade is still stuck in the RoS.
yes ur right, but remember it had armor in there too and they removed the armor concept design, maybe they removed the keyblade aswell
A
Audo
Guest
You don't know they removed the armour.
- Status