- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 199
Yeah.
Axel's copyrighted to Disney, Reno's copyrighted to SE. While Axel's based off of Reno, he doesn't belong to SE.
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
Yeah.
Axel's copyrighted to Disney, Reno's copyrighted to SE. While Axel's based off of Reno, he doesn't belong to SE.
Yeah.
Axel's copyrighted to Disney, Reno's copyrighted to SE. While Axel's based off of Reno, he doesn't belong to SE.
am i the only 1 who thinks disney is holding kh back?
am i the only 1 who thinks disney is holding kh back?
yeah plus everyone wouldn't be here if it wasnt for disney and Square enix...Most likely.
Without Disney, there is no Kingdom Hearts. Simple as that. Disney is more than half of KH. The rest of it is original. And then there's a tiny sliver in which FF plays in, but that's irrelevant anyways.
Well radient Garden xP ,anyway....guys kingdom hearts is NOT gonna take off disney or final fantasy....Disney composes Kingdom Hearts. If you take KH2 out of the equation, all of Kingdom Hearts was composed of Disney and Disney's villians.
KH2 was all about OCs, excluding maleficient. no FF players played a major part (you could say the radiant garden thing if you wanted too).
Technically yes. But it wouldn't seem like itmy friend says kh without ff would just be disney.
how can i say this is the best way to say that it wouldn't be popular without final fantasy...Technically, KH without Final Fantasy would be heavily FF-influenced spinoff that would not be as popular as KH is now.
Of course. I mean, really? How many people would actually play KH if Cloud wasn't in there? Or Sephiroth? :v
Of course. I mean, really? How many people would actually play KH if Cloud wasn't in there? Or Sephiroth? :v