- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 3,913
- Awards
- 82
It's designed to be interactive so you can flip back and forth at your discretion.
News ► Kingdom Hearts -HD 2.5 ReMIX- SD -> HD Comparison Trailer!
- Thread starter Chaser
- Start date
|
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
|
- Status
It's designed to be interactive so you can flip back and forth at your discretion.
I am looking forward to II.5 so much, primarily for the ability to play Birth by Sleep again. December 2nd is too far away. I wish they had shown Xemnas and Terra though. My concern is actually Xemnas. It would be nice if they replaced the render with the one used in Dream Drop Distance where his face is much smoother than it is in the original release of II.
Is it just me or was that Disney logo really big and noticeable? Usually it is just SE's logo at the start and Disney Interactive somewhere at the end. O:
This is easily the most noticeable difference in an HD remaster I've seen. I hope they show at least a little tease of one of the new battle scenes in Re:Coded.
I need a timeskip, dammit.
These outfits were added in 2007 for Kingdom Hearts 2 FM.
Time skip for what?
I think he means he needs to time-travel to December so he can play II.5 now.
It looks pretty good. 'Gorgeous' would be a stretch. I didn't expect it to look any better than it does. Hopefully the Coded film is displayed at 60 FPS.
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2013
- Messages
- 542
- Awards
- 12
*sigh*No one ever gets my jokes.
Jokes are not easily discernible on the internet.
I don't see a huge difference between SD and HD KH II. Aside from smoothening out pixels, the game looks pretty much the same in HD. I guess that speaks wonders to how well developed the graphics were the game back in '06.
BBS is the where the real improvement is. I can't believe it looked so bad. The keyblades make that really apparent.
BBS is the where the real improvement is. I can't believe it looked so bad. The keyblades make that really apparent.
Nope. I believe Nomura likes the look of 30fps that and the game's physics are tied to it's framerate -.-
lol I'm not a graphic junkie so I didn't really see a difference either, but BbS is understandable given the largest it was supposed to played at was still really small (if you hooked it up to your TV it's supposed to play really tiny still, but some TV's auto-stretch the image...mine did and it was bad...real bad).
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2009
- Messages
- 17,750
- Awards
- 36
I'm sort of confused by why some folks believe these are screenshots of a PS4 version?
I mean, this series has always gotten some pretty dinky screens before but this is what we should have been getting all along for a PS3 remaster. They've released some like this for X|X-2 as well.
I mean, this series has always gotten some pretty dinky screens before but this is what we should have been getting all along for a PS3 remaster. They've released some like this for X|X-2 as well.
That's not the PS3 remaster of 2.5. It's the PS3 remaster rendered in a much higher resolution and then down-sampled to 1080p or using another crazy AA technique.
Much like this isn't how 1.5 looks like
Spoiler Show
The FFX-2 screenshot looks more realistic to me - I haven't played the game though.
- Status