- Joined
- Dec 8, 2015
- Messages
- 26
Seems like a redundant question but ponder on it and you may see a purpose and meaning to the interpretation of the question.
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
I just call it a collaboration between Disney and Square. Square handles making the game itself while Disney decides on what intellectual properties can be used. It's a Disney game. And it's a Square Enix game.
It's a collab but Disney owns pretty much anything that wasn't an SE cameo. Even things or people Nomura makes originally for the series if memory serves. Kinda sad for him I bet.
It's a collab but Disney owns pretty much anything that wasn't an SE cameo. Even things or people Nomura makes originally for the series if memory serves. Kinda sad for him I bet.
Restricting Mickey in Kh1 as well? That was one right?Out of a sense of respect, they now don't do anything without his explicit approval anymore but still have veto/approval rights if they REALLY wanted to get it done.
This is also why they were able to start multiple animated series pitches, VCast...that mobile game from way back when that never happened...that other mobile game that was in dev before the head of Interactive left and they put in the new guy...the Hot Topic merchandise...scary ass Sora at Disneyland way back when.
8D
Restricting Mickey in Kh1 as well? That was one right?
Rather ironic when Disney themselves regularly mixed these characters in their TV spin off series. Such as the episodes of Aladdin and Hercules' shows in which they met.Yeah, as was the policy originally forbading any contact between pure movie characters from interacting with each other (meaning no Aladdin meeting Hercules or something similar) and why the whole "world order" stuff was introduced to begin with.
Now times have changed with things like Disney Infinity so I doubt that policy would be in effect anymore.