REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
why would people want a long tutorial? this is current gen, how hard would it be to play as xehanort, go over some combat and traversal basics for 10-20 minutes and jump into sora's story?
Heheh. You'd be surprised how long it can take some people to get into something. Or the points in which they decide to enter. Also gotta take into account that with a title as big of a deal as this, parents are gonna look at the game and think "oh hey, my kid might like that because Disney" and totally disregard any other element. Just from what I remember, that's how a lot of kids ended up with KHII all those years ago.I heartily agree. Even disregarding all the HD re-releases Square has been providing, I doubt anyone would be getting into this series fresh this late in the game.
I personally don't believe the way they handled the tutorial in KHII was inherently flawed, just hugely mishandled. If the story instead say, kept Roxas going for the extent of the game, the theming of the tutorial would have worked, highlighting the carefree last week of summer before receiving a call to adventure. However, as it turns out, Roxas vanishes right at the end of the tutorial, so all that time spent on his petty problems becomes totally irrelevant to the larger narrative.
About Kairi being most likely.. I don't know. But best? Yes. For me, at least. I would just love to play as a PoH, GoL and Keybladewielder at the same time! (Which Kairi is)
yesI'm going to go against the grain a bit here. I think we might play as Xion.
So what? The flashback plays at the beginning of KH III, so of course many people will want it as a tutorial or think it will be like that.Why is everyone jumping to the conclusion that we'll have Young Xehanort or Young Eraqus in the tutorial? Yes, we know that scene with them is in the beginning of the game but that doesn't mean they're playable. I think it's far more likely that the scene with Young Eraqus and Young Xehanort is a flashback scene of some kind. Didn't BBS have several flashback scenes in the beginning of the game? Am I missing some kind of hint that suggests that they are playable because I see no reason why they would be? Plus it's also kind of uncharacteristic of KH to do something like that.
I would like to start with Kairi, however because of 2.8 I feel like it could be Aqua or Mickey. Depending on where 2.8 ends, it could be either and just segue right into Mickey telling the story in the tower. Although, I'm trying to think of how the Xehanort/Eraqus scene can be linked to anything else. It makes me feel like maybe it could be a Xehanort flashback, so maybe we start with him?
yes
So what? The flashback plays at the beginning of KH III, so of course many people will want it as a tutorial or think it will be like that.
And do I need to remind you that we all are just speculating? Nobody said that definitely has to be that way.
None of the flashback's in BbS is playable, so no, you are not missing anything.
I don't really think we will play as Aqua, since she already will be playable in 0.2. Mickey, huh. Maybe.
I'm not so much jumping to conclusions as I am doing a little wishful thinking. I know it's far more likely that Trollanort and Kid Eraqus will be shown just in flashbacks, but it's fun to ponder the unlikely possibilities.Why is everyone jumping to the conclusion that we'll have Young Xehanort or Young Eraqus in the tutorial? Yes, we know that scene with them is in the beginning of the game but that doesn't mean they're playable. I think it's far more likely that the scene with Young Eraqus and Young Xehanort is a flashback scene of some kind. Didn't BBS have several flashback scenes in the beginning of the game? Am I missing some kind of hint that suggests that they are playable because I see no reason why they would be? Plus it's also kind of uncharacteristic of KH to do something like that.
Why is everyone jumping to the conclusion that we'll have Young Xehanort or Young Eraqus in the tutorial? Yes, we know that scene with them is in the beginning of the game but that doesn't mean they're playable. I think it's far more likely that the scene with Young Eraqus and Young Xehanort is a flashback scene of some kind. Didn't BBS have several flashback scenes in the beginning of the game? Am I missing some kind of hint that suggests that they are playable because I see no reason why they would be? Plus it's also kind of uncharacteristic of KH to do something like that.
I wouldn't say that the gameplay was THAT different, not enough to be a major factor in changing up the playable character. And if Roxas was playable for story reasons, why wouldn't the same happen for just about anyone else? "Story reasons" could justify any playable character.Most likely: none
I don't know why people want a tutorial character. Roxas was only a tutorial character because KH2 was extremely different from KH1 in terms of gameplay and for story reasons.
Ehh. They don't seem to have a problem with playable villains in Disney Infinity.Also, I don't know if Disney would want players to have the chance to play a villain such as Xehanort. I feel like if moms of younger players found out about it, they might even complain.