This question has come from a book that I once read and I modified it over time, but it was very intresting to ask this because of all the views it brings... pro life, pro choice, selfless scrafice, and much more. Anyways here is the scenrio.
Your a rich banker who has struck a deal to make over 10 million dollars. Your currently walking down a street and you notice a fire blazing in an apartment around the corner. Firefighters are not there yet and no one is around.
The delima your facing is that you have to make this meeting. If you chose not to go and save several lives, you will go bankrupt and lose ur assets on the deal. The investors are not a patient group of people.
----------IF YOU CHOSE NO---------------------------------------
You strike a wonderful deal and now you have 10 million dollars in your account. The end.
-----------IF YOU CHOSE YES TO GOTO THE APT--------------
Great now you lost all of your money and you know ur bankrupt. Maybe you can write book... whatever... now time to face the problem.
If you choose to go to the apartment, your faced with a new problem.
There are four rooms and the entire complex is apartment is about to collapse. There are four rooms each on a different floor total. In each room is what's described below.
Floor 1 - 250 Senior Citizens ranging from 75-110 years of age
Floor 2 - 25 Teenagers who just turned 18 and have not started college nor their adulthood
Floor 3 - 8 Pregeant Mothers who are on their 8th month and will deliever in a few days.
Floor 4 - 2 Babies who are about 6 months old alone.
Now, because of time, you can only choose to save ONLY ONE FLOOR. What floor would you save? Or you can peform the ultimate scarfice and save two floors, but you die in the process.
-----------------SUMMARY-------------
What would you do in mist of all this choas. Who would you save? Would choose the money knowingly know that you could of saved many lives? Would you scarfice yours? Do the mothers count more to save? Or the number of all the lives of all the senior citizens? What about the children who are already born?
Good luck with answering this question. :blush:
Your a rich banker who has struck a deal to make over 10 million dollars. Your currently walking down a street and you notice a fire blazing in an apartment around the corner. Firefighters are not there yet and no one is around.
The delima your facing is that you have to make this meeting. If you chose not to go and save several lives, you will go bankrupt and lose ur assets on the deal. The investors are not a patient group of people.
----------IF YOU CHOSE NO---------------------------------------
You strike a wonderful deal and now you have 10 million dollars in your account. The end.
-----------IF YOU CHOSE YES TO GOTO THE APT--------------
Great now you lost all of your money and you know ur bankrupt. Maybe you can write book... whatever... now time to face the problem.
If you choose to go to the apartment, your faced with a new problem.
There are four rooms and the entire complex is apartment is about to collapse. There are four rooms each on a different floor total. In each room is what's described below.
Floor 1 - 250 Senior Citizens ranging from 75-110 years of age
Floor 2 - 25 Teenagers who just turned 18 and have not started college nor their adulthood
Floor 3 - 8 Pregeant Mothers who are on their 8th month and will deliever in a few days.
Floor 4 - 2 Babies who are about 6 months old alone.
Now, because of time, you can only choose to save ONLY ONE FLOOR. What floor would you save? Or you can peform the ultimate scarfice and save two floors, but you die in the process.
-----------------SUMMARY-------------
What would you do in mist of all this choas. Who would you save? Would choose the money knowingly know that you could of saved many lives? Would you scarfice yours? Do the mothers count more to save? Or the number of all the lives of all the senior citizens? What about the children who are already born?
Good luck with answering this question. :blush: