REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
I just realized what you said in a previous post, the book can't be from the beginning of time, because the Master of masters wouldn't be around at the beginning of time, he's definitely a lot younger than a dinosaur, and we'll see.Yeah, "the end of KH3", which is what I said.
There's no reason he couldn't have seen past that, too, but I do think they talk about this at some point, I just don't remember where.
I remember a theory back when the first game was coming out that the reason for the name change was because Aeris died in FFVII and that Aerith was a different character.I hope you were around for the Aerith theory.
I kind of miss asshole Riku. He made Sora’s beef with the Darkness more personal And gave me a non-Disney villain that actually annoyed me enough to want to beat to death with a key shaped club1. MoM is just a bored god observing things within the KH multiverse. He's like Enna Kros from World of Final Fantasy or...the Watcher from the MCU. Just watching, messing with the timeline when they feel like it...
2. Riku isn't a sassy asshole anymore because when the heart collection machine purified Ansem SoD from his heart, SoD took the sass with him.
All of the Kingdom Hearts original characters belong to Disney, so Riku is a Disney character.I kind of miss asshole Riku. He made Sora’s beef with the Darkness more personal And gave me a non-Disney villain that actually annoyed me enough to want to beat to death with a key shaped club
I was just clarifying that Disney owns all the original characters, not everyone knows that, and I only brought it up because Sonofjafar said non-Disney villain, and it's a pretty common misconception, that's all.we know
When I said non-Disney, I meant characters that did not exist before kingdom hearts. Either way, I missed Riku being a jerkI was just clarifying that Disney owns all the original characters, not everyone knows that, and I only brought it up because Sonofjafar said non-Disney villain, and it's a pretty common misconception, that's all.
Oh, I'm sorry about that, I misunderstood.When I said non-Disney, I meant characters that did not exist before kingdom hearts. Either way, I missed Riku being a jerk
Tbf, if Square owned Sora he would have never gotten into smashI think it should be the default that when people are talking about "Disney characters" they're talking about characters actually made by people at Disney, as opposed to ones that Disney technically owns due to a contract that makes Nomura's original characters their intellectual property, a system that shouldn't even exist in the first place
This is not a "fair" counterpoint to "copyright law is bad"Tbf, if Square owned Sora he would have never gotten into smash
Without Disney’s influence, Kingdom Hearts would just be another final fantasy. Ya don’t like it, play something elseThis is not a "fair" counterpoint to "copyright law is bad"
No need to curse. I’m just tired of people trying to tone down Disney’s importance to this franchise. Do you really think Kingdom Hearts for popular because of the original contentWhat the fuck
Either way, this whole thing has derailed the entire thread so kindly stop talking about itDude I don't care whether or not KH is "popular", I just think copyright law is bad!!!!