Should videogames be more violent or less violent?
Videogame violence
- Thread starter key_bearer1
- Start date
|
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
|
- Status
Why shouldn't they be allowed to be more violent, because little kids might play the games? Should pornography be banned, because kids might see it?
Its fine how it is. No more, or no less.
It doesn't matter if they add more of less, the only reason the videogame companys keep getting into trouble is because the little kids parents don't want them to play such bad things like that or see violence at such a young age so they go complain about it, and then you wonder why the parents even let there little kids own such bad things. So really it doesn't matter to me.
Demon X said:
yeah i agree.
K
Kegluneq
Guest
they must get more violent!!!! more!!!!more!!!!more!!!!
Well games have ratings. Games that are too violent will be rated M, therefore litt;e kids won't ba able to play em' unless they have a big bro. And that's it.
games have ratings for a reason
If Video games spawned violent behavior I think I would have tried to hunt you down and kill you already.
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2005
- Messages
- 1,925
- Age
- 32
^ exactly. they're not spawning bad behaviour, and there are ratings, so keep the violence coming
i think that parents need to stop B.S.ing bout violent games when THEY let their kids play em'.actually i think that they should put more effort into the blood and gore graphics department.
I couldn't agree more, you can never get enough violence!seshomaru677 said:
the same amount.
More blood,guts,and,gore!!!when i blow sum 1's head off i wanna seem sum fountain works like kill bill.
Well, some games are getting too violent.
Foe_Hammer said:
Remember the badly-done Anime part where little girls father practically drowned the room in blood? That’s called over-the-top and looks nothing short of crap. More violence will eventually lead to games like Postal becoming normal. I admit seeing blood and gore in a game like Pikmin would be amusing to say the least, but not when they aren't necessary.
Would you like to see Cloud get covered in blood after chopping some random Lost monster in half? Probably, yes. However, repeat that scene in your head about 100 times. Get's dull, doesn't it? Want more gore, don't you? Want to see Aries get her nut chopped off and watch her body get flung off wall after wall by Sephiroth, who will then end up raping her dead body...
Yes, if you got what you wanted, you would eventually see things like that when the poor, old developers run out of ideas (which usually doesn't take very long). So, be happy with what you've got. I have made enough of a discussion out of this for now.
GeneralChaos said:
In Kill Bill's defence, the entire movie supposed to be that over-the-top...and it didn't look like crap.
Also, I doubt that most developers are going to put in more gore at the expense of gameplay.
Not...enough...violence!!!
Square Ninja said:
The rest of the film was fine. I personally thought the second one was better, but that is not what we are discussing.
Square Ninja said:
I notice you say most developers. Unfortunately, it only takes one lazy half-assed developer to ruin a perfectly good game by throwing in exploding heads or chop-able limbs. If Rockstar included such things in The Warriors, I wonder how quickly it would have sold...
- Status