60,000? odd not what I read.
Buuuut since Carbon Dating is a fake, they're probably hoaxes, and these were probably made in the Middle Ages, right?
I'm sorry I miscommunicated.
I'm not saying its fake.
Its inaccurate. like wikipedia theres a chance what you read might be true, but if you look into it further theres a chance it might not be true.
I'm not trying to do away with carbon dating, just merely stating that it cannot be trusted as accurate.
IE in the example carbon dating might be able to give us a basis for guessing, but an item could be easily drastically lower or higher then what the estimate is.
in your article it says:
Tests 20 years ago dated the fabric to between 1260 and 1390, but believers say it is an authentic image of Christ.
Since because of the varying inaccuracies of carbon dating this number could be off by a thousand or so years. (which isnt' unheard of) which would have been around the Time of Jesus.
I'm not trying to defend the Shroud of Tourin. I'm not saying its actuallly Jesus.. I mean lets say for arguments sake it came from the area he was supposed to be in. it could have been any nazarene man considering they all had long hair. etc (reasons why it might not be actually Jesus)
I'm also not trying to do away with carbon dating.
Just theres plenty of room to doubt it. it might be right, it might not be.
Thus my original statement. this doesnt prove or disprove anything.