Just came back from watching
Mistress of Evil, and yup, Maleficent is still the most interesting and weird of Disney's live-action remakes and I'm glad the sequel keeps up with that spirit.
The sequel is solid but the story doesn't quite have the same "wow, where did that come from?!" shocker & flavor from the first movie, that's not to say it lacks interesting new ideas because it brings quite a bunch of them (particularly on the second act where some more cynical eyes would call blantant cinematic universe set up of material), they just don't have same level of gravitas and focus of the first movie. And I think this is probably the most contentious thing about
Mistress of Evil, is it good that the movie has many new ideas going for but not quite deeply developed or would it have been better having less stuff but more developed? Where I stand, stumble by over-ambtion generally preferable to success by the books.
There's a large focus on the supporting cast this time around and I think many will likely be satisfied with that, and even when Maleficent is absent for long stretches of time she manages make her screentime impactful and all is thanks to Jolie's delightful performance, she's a bae goth queen.
This one won't convert into believers people that weren't sold with the previous film but most fans of the first will have a good time.
All the constume and set designs are worthy of Oscar nomination.
If they make more of this and have the same spirit I will go and watch them with lot of enthusiasm.
Phoenix Maleficent >>>>>> Dragon Maleficent
FIGHT ME!
though I wish they did more with it...
Also on that note, Maleficent is now inmortal? Kinda?