l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
Who's being testy? Not once did I display my emotions in my entire post.
"Try to at least use puncuation and proper grammar if your going to judge a political figure."
......okay fine then you weren't testy.... moving on...
l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
What are you trying to say? That because they spread hate they should'nt be allowed to protest? Freedom of Speech applies to everyones views and opinions, no matter how wrong they may seem. Also by calling them bastards, you yourself are displaying your own emotions.
Are you a homophobe cause you sound like it. anyways ignoring my previous comment, do you honestly think it is alright for people to do that $#!+ if you say yes you're just like a homophobe and that would make you to fit the terms right "unjust". if you say no then you're contradicting your own point by putting limits on freedom of speech when you basically suggested there are none or should be none.
l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
your original quote about Bush listening in on personal phone calls and about how that thought was kind of rash and i'll decided.
l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
Clinton got impeached for lying about a blowjob. I think its fair to assume Bush can be impeached for lying to an entire nation aobut WMDs and dragging them into a costly war which still rages on today.
it's legal to go to war if you clear it however it is illegal to have an affair which was the reason he was impeached. WMDs?
l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
I've never heard of Iraq ever unleashing Nuclear Warheads on other countries.
what more can you expect from a C average student.... i think that's one of his MISUNDERESTIMATED speeches.
l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
Wrong? Hmm I wonder, was it intelligence or merely made up?
we may never know but we can't unless it's from the direct source and we have to assume the person is or isn't lying....
l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
In a debate, the goal is to present your side using Ethos (ethics), Pathos (emotion) and Logos (logic) in order to win. No one goes into a debate wanting to defend both sides, but merely presume that their side is right and to convince the other side to agree with them.
also in a debate you have to consider the other side as well before you go on a shooting spree armed to the teeth with one-sided opinions.
l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
Over 600,000 people agree with me on impeaching Bush, and thanks to a few sites that number grows everyday. It is also my right to assembly and my freedom of speech that allows me to say whatever I want about the president.
so then you're saying it's alright to protest gay marriage at a funeral or at a wedding? it's the same answer no matter what you say.... Also did you hear what i said about understanding someone before you become a protestor towards a single man?
l4t1n0pr1d3 said:
If you want I'll pm you a long list of the things I'd do if I were president. Trust me, the things I would do would be better for this country than anything Bush could do. Now can you drop the act of trying to make yourself sound more mature by being the "devils advocate" and finally start a real conversation on how you think Bush is doing rather than stating only 2 things?
please don't PM me with worthless crap i know what Bush has and hasn't done well and i get an idea of what you would do differently. Also what would you have done let our country be incinerated by the enemy? If i quote this correctly "In the game of war there are no rules and no set time limit". So after that quote what would you do if they attacked us don't be a flower hugging tree kissing sugar plum fairy cause it's obvious we'd have to go to war then it's and would have been a neccesary. Even if they didn't strike first are you going to let them we had facts and we did capture a dangerous criminal that's we do with criminals it's no different from catching criminals in our country. Except you don't see protestors about that. Even if we were wrong with Intel on the nuclear weapons we did get Saddam that in itself is a major victory. Also if you retrack your footsteps you'll find a bread crumb trail that leads to me saying i am Democrat and i also dislike Bush i only say what i say to further my opinion.
iheartriku said:
okay yes he has captured SADDAM...and he has spread democracy...but do you really think democracy is good for the people over there???...
it's been said it's a justified form of government we might have said the same thing about other countries but some of them managed to adapt it just takes time of which many people are not willing to take.
Bahamut Zero said:
I don't have to explain myself, you guys already have.
and i argued against it so you do need to back up your big talk.... no offense...
Savior of Dawn said:
Er, I suggest you add some reasons as to your post, or you'll be ripped to shreds by Bushy-fanboys.
hehe bushy-fanboys.... anyways i am not a fanboy nor am i in favor of Bush i merely stated stuff so this wouldn't be so one-sided.