So LightUpTheSky in another thread was actually taking this in a similar direction to where I wanted to go, and I want to take a second to address her post:
I had wanted to talk about this "last key" thing, but for a slightly different reason (and I had not made the connection to the title of Chi itself, clever!).
Instead, I was going to relate it to Donald and Goofy's use of the word "key" in the chi Anniversary events:
What seems immediately apparent is that Donald and Goofy are in a scenario similar to the one in Traverse Town during KH1. Searching for a "key" per the King's instruction. So they don't know what a Keyblade is?
Well, actually, they do! The above transcript comes from the 2nd Anniversary event. In the 1st Anniversary event:
Donald does use the term. So why are they using "key" instead of Keyblade?
Well, notice at a couple points they call you, the Player, the "key."
A key that is not a Keyblade per se. What could they be alluding to?
The Key to Return Hearts. Nomura said that in KH3, SDG will be searching for the Key to Return Hearts without even being sure of what it is. It could be a keyblade, some other item, perhaps even a person.
As to how this relates to Kairi, it's actually pretty simple.
Remember that Kairi did something unprecedented in KH1, something that has not happened since. She just flat out returned Sora's heart, without even the use of a Keyblade.
Return. Hearts.
The "Key."
Or, as the KH3D secret ending marks Kairi, the "last key."
Now I'm not saying that Kairi necessarily is the Key to Return Hearts, but she's a damn good place to start based on her ability. So, basically, if Kairi were in the Sleeping Worlds for her Mark of Mastery, I could see Mickey, Donald and Goofy entering her dreams to look for this key.
And obviously, they're not going to find the Key since that's KH3's territory, but yeah.
I don't think you understand my whole point about not saying something like "Maybe if Kairi gets mad enough she'll just develop darkness out of nowhere!"
You said in that post, and again in this one, that "[my] argument is that she basically can "just cause""... which is... not at all true. I was offering that as an example of "just because." As in, pulling an argument out of one's ass with no discernible evidence.
Now I totally admit when my theories are a stretch (if you go back in my threads, you'll notice a trend of warning labels stating something along the lines of "this idea is really out there" lol) and you're free to feel what you want about the plausibility, but my argument is "just 'cuz"? No. Like, that just makes me think you either didn't read my post or didn't understand it.
I'm arguing from analogy. Literally, I'm using evidence from one case (ie Sora and Roxas), and applying it to another (Kairi and Namine). You can't in good faith call that "just 'cuz." In fact, arguing from analogy is the bulk of theorizing that is done for this series, it's one of the few tools we have for extrapolating to figure out where things might be headed.
Ummm... Namine's unique existence is what my argument hinges on lol.
Literally, I'm not sure if there would be any viable way to get darkness in Kairi's heart without some exceptional, bizarre circumstances. Like Namine. As I said.
I'm making assumptions? I'm inferring from another case to build the theory. I'm not stating it as fact. I acknowledge that it's just as well a possibility that Kairi cannot feel Namine's emotions. She either does or does not, and implementing one or the other in a theory is completely valid. We've seen with Sora and Roxas that these vicarious feelings are possible and thus the question is on the table as something that ought to be addressed. It's not something I'm pulling from nowhere... or "just because."
Roxas and Sora are not a norm....
This is an extremely flimsy argument. You realize we've barely seen Kairi since the events of KH2, right? There's been virtually no opportunity to address it.
You realize this is going toward what I've been saying? I don't know if you're getting hung up on my use of the term "corrupted" because it's vague or what, but my entire point of even suggesting this in the first place was to justify the presence of Dream Eaters (darkness) in Kairi's dream.
I'm not trying to argue that Kairi is going to have her heart consumed by darkness or something. While I do think it would make for an interesting character arc if Kairi had to deal with internal darkness (if only because she never has), it doesn't have to be something heavily addressed. The presence of darkness in her in some capacity is just a natural consequence of the theory, or it at least bends in that direction.
I think I might have just realized something that furthers the possibility of Kairi being the one dreaming about these events taking place in Key.
Mainly because it looks like to me that Dream Drop Distance's secret ending was actually foretelling II.8 all along.
We have Dream Drop Distance itself in II.8, to perhaps cover the "the darkness awakens" part with Young Master Xehanort's actions in 3D; the "the light in the darkness" part of that secret ending (where it shows Aqua) is being fulfilled by 0.2, so then all that's left is the "leads to the last key" tagline from it (where it shows Kairi). And what else is included in II.8, and has the term "key" in its title? Kingdom Hearts Key: Back Cover.
Kairi's being referred to as "the last key" at the very end of KH3D, and all of these games about the Keyblade War are called "Kingdom Hearts Key something or another". Coincidence? You tell me
I had wanted to talk about this "last key" thing, but for a slightly different reason (and I had not made the connection to the title of Chi itself, clever!).
Instead, I was going to relate it to Donald and Goofy's use of the word "key" in the chi Anniversary events:
Goofy: Oh yeah! While we're at it, the matter in the King's letter-
Donald: The "key" right? Okay, let's go look for it!
[...]
Donald, Goofy:The Key!
Goofy: In any case, it seems that this is the real "key".
Donald: Is this kid really the "key" the King told us?
[...]
Donald: This kid is definitely the "key"!
What seems immediately apparent is that Donald and Goofy are in a scenario similar to the one in Traverse Town during KH1. Searching for a "key" per the King's instruction. So they don't know what a Keyblade is?
Well, actually, they do! The above transcript comes from the 2nd Anniversary event. In the 1st Anniversary event:
Donald: Hmm... Oh yeah, the Keyblade! Why do you have one?
Donald does use the term. So why are they using "key" instead of Keyblade?
Well, notice at a couple points they call you, the Player, the "key."
A key that is not a Keyblade per se. What could they be alluding to?
The Key to Return Hearts. Nomura said that in KH3, SDG will be searching for the Key to Return Hearts without even being sure of what it is. It could be a keyblade, some other item, perhaps even a person.
As to how this relates to Kairi, it's actually pretty simple.
Remember that Kairi did something unprecedented in KH1, something that has not happened since. She just flat out returned Sora's heart, without even the use of a Keyblade.
Return. Hearts.
The "Key."
Or, as the KH3D secret ending marks Kairi, the "last key."
Now I'm not saying that Kairi necessarily is the Key to Return Hearts, but she's a damn good place to start based on her ability. So, basically, if Kairi were in the Sleeping Worlds for her Mark of Mastery, I could see Mickey, Donald and Goofy entering her dreams to look for this key.
And obviously, they're not going to find the Key since that's KH3's territory, but yeah.
Your being perfectly clear but it's apparent our arguments to you aren't. No ones saying something asinine like she's gonna sprout dark blots on the heart from anger or anything similar to it.
I don't think you understand my whole point about not saying something like "Maybe if Kairi gets mad enough she'll just develop darkness out of nowhere!"
You said in that post, and again in this one, that "[my] argument is that she basically can "just cause""... which is... not at all true. I was offering that as an example of "just because." As in, pulling an argument out of one's ass with no discernible evidence.
Now I totally admit when my theories are a stretch (if you go back in my threads, you'll notice a trend of warning labels stating something along the lines of "this idea is really out there" lol) and you're free to feel what you want about the plausibility, but my argument is "just 'cuz"? No. Like, that just makes me think you either didn't read my post or didn't understand it.
I'm arguing from analogy. Literally, I'm using evidence from one case (ie Sora and Roxas), and applying it to another (Kairi and Namine). You can't in good faith call that "just 'cuz." In fact, arguing from analogy is the bulk of theorizing that is done for this series, it's one of the few tools we have for extrapolating to figure out where things might be headed.
Your also not taking into account Namines unique existence into your own argument. Just because Sora felt something of Roxas does not mean it goes both ways. Your making jumps in assumption there.
Ummm... Namine's unique existence is what my argument hinges on lol.
Literally, I'm not sure if there would be any viable way to get darkness in Kairi's heart without some exceptional, bizarre circumstances. Like Namine. As I said.
I'm making assumptions? I'm inferring from another case to build the theory. I'm not stating it as fact. I acknowledge that it's just as well a possibility that Kairi cannot feel Namine's emotions. She either does or does not, and implementing one or the other in a theory is completely valid. We've seen with Sora and Roxas that these vicarious feelings are possible and thus the question is on the table as something that ought to be addressed. It's not something I'm pulling from nowhere... or "just because."
If your gonna use Namines unique nature to argue against the norm then the norm of Roxas-Sora must also be looked at with grains of salt.
Roxas and Sora are not a norm....
Especially when we've never seen or had written words to say or even hint that Kairi has felt Namines feelings or memories. (unlike Sora in which we see him feel moments or when Roxas shows him his memories in DDD)
This is an extremely flimsy argument. You realize we've barely seen Kairi since the events of KH2, right? There's been virtually no opportunity to address it.
Eidt: Hell for all we know it's Namines darkness just running lose within the dreams but not actually corrupting Kairis own heart. Things being in a dream in the first place leaves any concretes iffy due to the nature of dreams in general. (such as how heartless behave upon destruction in Chi or how the RoS has dream eaters which devour dreams/nightmares rather than hearts like the heartless do in other realms)
You realize this is going toward what I've been saying? I don't know if you're getting hung up on my use of the term "corrupted" because it's vague or what, but my entire point of even suggesting this in the first place was to justify the presence of Dream Eaters (darkness) in Kairi's dream.
I'm not trying to argue that Kairi is going to have her heart consumed by darkness or something. While I do think it would make for an interesting character arc if Kairi had to deal with internal darkness (if only because she never has), it doesn't have to be something heavily addressed. The presence of darkness in her in some capacity is just a natural consequence of the theory, or it at least bends in that direction.