Well as the title reads, this isn't a theory but an idea. Theres something that I noticed that although other people have noticed, they fail to see the connection of this particular idea to another idea. Basically, this thread is more or less of a mental red bull to that could possibly change the way that theories are thought up of about the unbirths and their enigmatic origins.
To start off, lets take a look at nobodies and heartless. Now, we all know that although they are named Heartless and nobodies, they seem to be misnomers since heartless are the hearts of people and nobodies are the bodies (and souls) of people. Like I said, people most likely already knew about this, but could possibly fail to make the next connection even now.
Get it?
If so, good for you, you've been enlightened. If not, think about it for a minute, you'll get it soon enough. Anyways, that's not the only thing I noticed. Upon closer inspection you'll notice that the names are also paradoxes. The heartless, even though they are the hearts, can be said to not possess hearts since they ARE the heart, animated with darkness for those who are nitpicky about exactness, and therefore don't possess it (ex: I am a person but that doesn't mean i own a person). Therefore, the heartless in a sense do have a heart but don;t have it at the same time. As for the nobodies, the same could be said, but is taken a step further by the fact that since they they don't exist(or aren't supposed to exist) they don't have a body, and therefore is a paradox like the heartless.
So now, if you didn't get the first connection, then you'll probably still ask what the meaning of this one was. Hopefully most of you are smart enough to have made the connection even before you finished reading the second paragraph, which if you did, congrats, go think about this for awhile. If not, well then It looks like I'll have to spoon feed you.
Basically what I'm saying is that although the unbirths are named unbirths, they could possibly be beings which have reached some sort of true birth, excelling humans or other beings in some sort of way. With my second paragraph, I'm saying that despite this, they may also paradoxically also be unbirthed, perhaps metaphorically or literally.
Anyways, yeah, just some ideas to get the theories going. Use this if you'd like for your next theory, I'll be lurking around to see if anyone uses this at some point in the future.
To start off, lets take a look at nobodies and heartless. Now, we all know that although they are named Heartless and nobodies, they seem to be misnomers since heartless are the hearts of people and nobodies are the bodies (and souls) of people. Like I said, people most likely already knew about this, but could possibly fail to make the next connection even now.
Get it?
If so, good for you, you've been enlightened. If not, think about it for a minute, you'll get it soon enough. Anyways, that's not the only thing I noticed. Upon closer inspection you'll notice that the names are also paradoxes. The heartless, even though they are the hearts, can be said to not possess hearts since they ARE the heart, animated with darkness for those who are nitpicky about exactness, and therefore don't possess it (ex: I am a person but that doesn't mean i own a person). Therefore, the heartless in a sense do have a heart but don;t have it at the same time. As for the nobodies, the same could be said, but is taken a step further by the fact that since they they don't exist(or aren't supposed to exist) they don't have a body, and therefore is a paradox like the heartless.
So now, if you didn't get the first connection, then you'll probably still ask what the meaning of this one was. Hopefully most of you are smart enough to have made the connection even before you finished reading the second paragraph, which if you did, congrats, go think about this for awhile. If not, well then It looks like I'll have to spoon feed you.
Basically what I'm saying is that although the unbirths are named unbirths, they could possibly be beings which have reached some sort of true birth, excelling humans or other beings in some sort of way. With my second paragraph, I'm saying that despite this, they may also paradoxically also be unbirthed, perhaps metaphorically or literally.
Anyways, yeah, just some ideas to get the theories going. Use this if you'd like for your next theory, I'll be lurking around to see if anyone uses this at some point in the future.
Misread! Do-over.