Re: Monster Inc. 2
Yeah, I mean, it's Pixar, so it definitely has a shot at being good.
But still, the point of a prequel is to provide an interesting narrative that leads up to the original. This premise doesn't really sound like that's the goal. I mean, the friendship was only important in the movie because they needed the two contrasting characters to play off each other to help make it entertaining. It doesn't really help build the story as much as it does provide some auxiliary background; which is nice and all, but doesn't seem like it would be strong enough to hold the whole movie.
Personally, I think a better idea for a prequel would be to focus on more on Waternoose. Learning some background on the company itself (since that was a large part of why the original was interesting), as well as how Waternoose and his family created/affected it could be really interesting (especially in the hands of Pixar).
Yeah, I mean, it's Pixar, so it definitely has a shot at being good.
But still, the point of a prequel is to provide an interesting narrative that leads up to the original. This premise doesn't really sound like that's the goal. I mean, the friendship was only important in the movie because they needed the two contrasting characters to play off each other to help make it entertaining. It doesn't really help build the story as much as it does provide some auxiliary background; which is nice and all, but doesn't seem like it would be strong enough to hold the whole movie.
Personally, I think a better idea for a prequel would be to focus on more on Waternoose. Learning some background on the company itself (since that was a large part of why the original was interesting), as well as how Waternoose and his family created/affected it could be really interesting (especially in the hands of Pixar).