What's new

Welcome to Kingdom Hearts Insider

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more. It's also quick and totally free, so what are you waiting for?

Ask question

Ask Questions and Get Answers from Our Community

Ask a Mod

Ask Questions from your staff

Contact Staff

If you need additional information or have a concern please contact us.

  • Hello everybody! We have tons of new awards for the new year that can be requested through our Awards System thanks to Antifa Lockhart! Some are limited-time awards so go claim them before they are gone forever...

    CLICK HERE FOR AWARDS

Kingdom Hearts doesnt have many female characters tbh ngl



REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS

TrueTroper

Member
Joined
May 5, 2021
Messages
34
Reaction score
37
Points
18
Awards
1
It's funny how bad KH is at writing female characters when most of the writers also worked on Final Fantasy. Which handles its characters more competently. They have their problems like FF10-2 but I still prefer hanging out with the Gullwings than any of these girls.
Important note: Nomura isn't Executive Producer/Director/Story guy of EVERY Final Fantasy series like he is in KH, meaning that rather than being limited to just one guy's opinion of what the female characters need to be like, the female characters in FF are allowed to be more diverse. If anything, Nomura has too much power over the KH series and its characters.

Kairi’s problem is that she is a very outdated idea of what a love interest/heroine is.
At this rate, I'm wondering if it's less Kairi and more Nomura's outdated idea on how he believes a female should behave...

The controversy wasn't about attacking women, but that in an organization otherwise full of men, the only women would be traitors. It's a very bad look.
And now there's the implication that Larxene only joined the O13 and went along with Xehanort's plan was because of her feelings for Marluxia... Just like Kairi who joined the final battle in KH3 because of Sora. So Nomura went from the message that "female traitors gives women a bad look and it makes me look bad for presenting them that way so I won't do that" to "female characters sacrifice everything to be with their love and do everything that they do and I think that's an acceptable message for young girls to learn so I'm okay presenting it in the series"? That still seems like a pretty toxic message for him to be putting out there...
 
Last edited:

Rodin

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
164
Points
63
Awards
3
Location
USA
Important note: Nomura isn't Executive Producer/Director/Story guy of EVERY Final Fantasy series like he is in KH, meaning that rather than being limited to just one guy's opinion of what the female characters need to be like, the female characters in FF are allowed to be more diverse. If anything, Nomura has too much power over the KH series and its characters.


At this rate, I'm wondering if it's less Kairi and more Nomura's outdated idea on how he believes a female should behave...


And now there's the implication that Larxene only joined the O13 and went along with Xehanort's plan was because of her feelings for Marluxia... Just like Kairi who joined the final battle in KH3 because of Sora. So Nomura went from the message that "female traitors gives women a bad look and it makes me look bad for presenting them that way so I won't do that" to "female characters sacrifice everything to be with their love and do everything that they do and I think that's an acceptable message for young girls to learn so I'm okay presenting it in the series"? That still seems like a pretty toxic message for him to be putting out there...
There are more writing credits for each game. It may be Nomura's vision but he's not the only one in the driving seat.
 
Last edited:

Noivern

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2019
Messages
375
Reaction score
276
Points
63
Awards
6
Age
25
I definitely agree that the main issue is the lack of female characters. The writing is also bad with most of them ending up as damsels in distress at some point or another but honestly, that kinda applies to almost every character as well, lol. Besides Riku and Roxas, every character gets a shitty development (if they even get developed past one game, that is), and even those two were damsels in distress at some point, being rescued by Sora.

But when you have like almost 3 times more boys than girls in a franchise, it becomes very evident which one got it worse.
 

TrueTroper

Member
Joined
May 5, 2021
Messages
34
Reaction score
37
Points
18
Awards
1
There are more writing credits for each game. It may be Nomura's vision but he's not the only one in the driving seat.

Maybe.
That's a fair point to make.

I guess what I was trying to say, and poorly at that, was that KH3, a game where Nomura served as a Director, Writer, and Artist, gave him a unique position to control the story. Writers and artists both influence how a game turns out, and since Nomura was the only artist and a co-writer with Masaru Oka, he had plenty of ways to exert his control on the game's development.

Yes, there were indeed others working on the series' alongside Nomura, he was even Co-Director with Tai Yasue for KH3, but none of the people who are credited with helping to develop the game are listed as having 3 simultaneous positions like Nomura. The closest was Tai Yasue, who was both Co-Director and level Designer, but that's still only two positions compared to 3 at once. IMHO, all these positions make it seem like if Nomura wanted something in the game, he was definitely in a position to exert some pull to make it happen.
 

TrueTroper

Member
Joined
May 5, 2021
Messages
34
Reaction score
37
Points
18
Awards
1
I definitely agree that the main issue is the lack of female characters. The writing is also bad with most of them ending up as damsels in distress at some point or another but honestly, that kinda applies to almost every character as well, lol. Besides Riku and Roxas, every character gets a shitty development (if they even get developed past one game, that is), and even those two were damsels in distress at some point, being rescued by Sora.

But when you have like almost 3 times more boys than girls in a franchise, it becomes very evident which one got it worse.
This. This so much. Too many characters, too few female characters, and not enough character development to go around... I really hope Nomura learns something for Phase 2 of KH and keeps the cast limited in order to allow everyone a good chunk of development...
 

Rodin

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
164
Points
63
Awards
3
Location
USA
Ironically Namine and Xion felt handicapped by their connection to Kairi. Now that they are their own person, maybe they might improve?

I don't think the offshoot characters like Roxas, Namine, Xion and Vanitas were a bad idea. They just don't explore their host character that well. This is worse for Kairi because she's such a non-entity in the games. So you don't really feel Namine gives any insight into Kairi.

Hell if you scrapped the nobody concept, Namine and the other nobodies would be fine. Xemnas is the only character you'd have to really retool.

Maybe Xion but the replica angle isn't the issue to me. Xion just feels like she's more of the same than a brand new character.

Granted Xion was more handicapped by Days itself. Even as a Roxas fan I just saw Days as unnecessary and tedious. So Xion wasn't done any favors.

Honestly I would've been fine if Roxas, Namine and Xion were regular nobodies like the others. It just feels simpler and less hoops to jump through.

Better late than never.
 
Last edited:

Elysium

Villain by Necessity
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
3,207
Reaction score
892
Points
114
Awards
34
Maybe I'm alone, but I always found Namine and Xion much more interesting than Kairi. I know we're supposed to connect them to Kairi, but aside from her being a reason for their appearance / existence, I didn't think they were much like her otherwise. Their personalities feel as little like hers as Roxas' personality does Sora's.
 

Elysium

Villain by Necessity
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
3,207
Reaction score
892
Points
114
Awards
34
The controversy wasn't about attacking women, but that in an organization otherwise full of men, the only women would be traitors. It's a very bad look.
True. And it would be even worse when you think it out fully: two female characters manipulate the male protagonist to do their dirty work because they're too weak to overthrow the rest of the Organization (all men) themselves.
 
Last edited:

Dark Rot

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2021
Messages
58
Reaction score
73
Points
18
Awards
2
I think female Marluxia would have been pretty compelling. If they had gone that direction, she'd be more popular than he is now. I think they were overthinking it, and most people wouldn't have cared. Most famous Disney villains are deceitful, manipulative women and we love them for it. Being a traitor to an evil organization ain't so bad anyway.

I don't personally care about having enough characters of a certain sex, if we're just talking numbers and proportions. I can imagine a KH game with only male original characters and think that would be cool. A game with all female characters could also be cool.

But the girls do get the short end of the stick, and do feel "unfavored" as characters. I actually would like to see a really cool new female protagonist, who steers her own story and is uniquely herself, though maybe a crazy female villain would be more comfortable for Nomura... and I'm fine with that too.
 

Raz

i'm nobody
Staff member
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
9,159
Reaction score
181
Points
65
Awards
8
Age
27
Location
Midwest
True. And it would be even worse when you think it out fully: two female characters manipulate the male protagonist to do their dirty work because they're too weak to overthrow the rest of the Organization (all men) themselves.

I think there's a reading of this situation that could be more empowering than problematic, if handled right. But we barely know the reasons behind Marluxia and Larxene's choice to betray of the Organization.

I wonder if Larxene (Elrena) will get any development as the series unfolds. I hope so. I find her so dynamic. And I'd like the VA to show a softer side to Elrena, while retaining her sparky attitude of course.
 

Zackarix

New member
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Awards
2
The idea that Marluxia was made a man to avoid unfortunate implications gets repeated a lot, but I've never seen a citation for it. The closest quote supporting that idea that I can find was in Character's Report Vol. 2:
Marluxia
During the plotting stage we intended him to be a woman, but we thought about the balance with Larxene and made him a man. When you consider how he was entrusted with Castle Oblivion despite being Number 11 of the Organisation, you can tell just what a cunning character he is. I wasn't able to show this to you, but I'm sure you can imagine how he played the perfect 'can-do man' in front of Xemnas. He's quite the actor.
--Nomura

Larxene
She ended up being the only female character in the Organisation, but in effect it made her more of an individual, which I think is good. I had a firm image of her voice, so hers was the very first voice actor we decided on. Adding that voice made her all the more brutal, didn't it? As for that hairstyle. I'm the one who drew it and it's still a mystery to me. ...Why did I give her that hair?
--Nomura
This confirms that Marluxia was originally intended to be a woman, but provides very different reasoning for the change. It was about balance and making Larxene stand out. Which makes sense, because if they were actually worried about how the situation looked the obvious answer is "make a few more members into women" instead of "make one of them a man".
 

Willow A113

Active member
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
329
Reaction score
160
Points
43
Awards
26
Age
16
Location
į'ʍ ɾìցհէ ҍҽհìղժ վօմ... Ͳմɾղ ąɾօմղժ...
The idea that Marluxia was made a man to avoid unfortunate implications gets repeated a lot, but I've never seen a citation for it. The closest quote supporting that idea that I can find was in Character's Report Vol. 2:

This confirms that Marluxia was originally intended to be a woman, but provides very different reasoning for the change. It was about balance and making Larxene stand out. Which makes sense, because if they were actually worried about how the situation looked the obvious answer is "make a few more members into women" instead of "make one of them a man".
Yeah I always wished there were more female org members.
 
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Top