Doesn't necessarily mean the games suck though.
ds low quality
- Thread starter keykingz13
- Start date
|
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
|
- Status
OMGosh. The graphics do not suck. Sure, they're not as good as SOME machines, but they don't suck by any standards. You can't compare the graphics of one machine to another.
Ugh. Stupid posts make me want to vomit. D:
Ugh. Stupid posts make me want to vomit. D:
Last edited:
They don't suck.
Just because they aren't as capable as the other systems doesn't mean they suck.
Horrible logic.
The Wii and the DS is capable of decent enough graphics.
They're certainly more than capable of KH graphics.
Hell, the GBA could practically pull off the KH graphics.
Im just hating on Nintendo. I dont like them. I prefer Sony.
So...
I see we have a bit of a console war going on here.
The graphics are really good for Nintendo DS. I don't have a ds myself, I only have a psp, but I've seen typical screenshots of DS games. And these are pretty damn good.
If I do say so myself.
I see we have a bit of a console war going on here.
The graphics are really good for Nintendo DS. I don't have a ds myself, I only have a psp, but I've seen typical screenshots of DS games. And these are pretty damn good.
If I do say so myself.
I don't think that it will be all that great, myself.
But, that's my opinion, and really does not belong on this thread.
Maybe later I'll complain about it.
Wait, what?
In reality, the visuals are superb for the DS. Square is taking all measures possible to ensure it resembles past games. However, the DS has System limitations in terms of graphics processing. It is impossiblefor it to look like the others down to the last sprite and pixel. Be greatful square is generous enough to give you a 3D adventure at all. They could have taken the easy way out and yielded you generic sprites with linear environments and added a ****load of touchscreen functions. This is light years more satisfying.
Yeah. Because ds screen is so lame.
I think it's safe to say
sora364's post > all of your posts.
Seriously, you might just as well complain about Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories not being on par with Kingdom Hearts 1 and 2 in terms of graphics. That's ridiculous.
Every system has its own limitations and how SE managed to build up such a fluid and clear 3D environment a la "Super Mario 64 DS", is really quite impressive.
I've noticed that the longer I wait for this game, the less I care about the graphics and voice acting, etc. All I want is a fun game with a great story. I'm just glad that they have decided to add voices and close-to-PS2 graphics, because it's enhancing what already sounds like a very good game.
^^Mind elaborating a bit on that? The only difference I have noted is the brightness of the screens.
BTW is the red and black DS the same as the DS Lite?
BTW is the red and black DS the same as the DS Lite?
Oops! In quality I ment lightscreen! So sorry! Oh and by Red & Black I ment the DS Lite, the one that's red in the upper secment of the DS and black in the other parts, it seems more elegant... Wow, it's rare to see a person that says that a game console is elegant.... >.>
kh2 graphics were good and kh1 and to me 358/2 days looks like the exact same good graphics as the ps2.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2008
- Messages
- 437
- Location
- where am I?!?!?! WHERE ARE YOU!?!?!
- Website
- www.youtube.com
kh ds looks amazing for DS standards, as long as its a good game, theirs no need to complain
C
Colours
Guest
See this is the thing, there button/actions depend on the ds console you have.
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 595
its a ds. you can't expect the graphics to be on the same level as the psp. it just can't achieve that feet yet. but still, you have to admit that for the ds, it is still a nice picture to look at. and yes, those shots were blown up to show more detail, so of course everything is going to look distorted and probably more pixelated than it should be.
That's just a lie. The Wii is twice as powerful as the GCN, which was already notably more powerful than the PS2. A lot of Wii games I've seen look better than anything that I ever saw on PS2.
While I do agree with most of what you're saying, I would like to state that I would have absolutely no problems with the game if it used sprites instead. I don't see why everyone makes such a big deal out of them. You'd imagine that 3D is naturally better for the game, allowing it to feel more real, giving the game more emotion, but this isn't always so. Look at CoM: it used sprites, but had the best character development/handling of any KH game to date. Infinitely better than KH2's, I'd have to say.
And I, for one, feel that not using the touchscreen functions is a bit of a waste. Really, I think this talk of "keeping the feel of KH won't be possible with the touchscreen" is a load of BS. Many game series that have been on the DS had many new additions, notably touchscreen functionality, and the games still felt like they were from their respective series. If the team making the game was skilled enough, 358/2 could very well use them and still feel very much like a KH game.
Though, if it would really ruin the feel of KH to use the touchscreen, I would have rather had the game on PSP. Because honestly, the biggest asset the DS has over the PSP is just that. Since it doesn't utilize the function, by putting it on PSP instead, there wouldn't be much of a difference, except most technical aspects like graphics would be bettered. Not to mention that instead of having to buy two systems for the games, I could just buy one and save me the trouble. Which shows they're mostly putting it on the DS to take advantage of the userbase, and while I can't blame them for wanting to make money...yeah.
Last edited:
- Status