I wanted to ask because I watched a video earlier. I wanna know if Scar has a nobody or not because he kept his body as a heartless too. Sorry if this has been discussed already.
Does Scar have a nobody?
- Thread starter Roxas9001
- Start date
|
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
|
- Status
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2007
- Messages
- 3,136
- Awards
- 3
Him turning into a heartless was just a lame excuse for Sora to be able to fight him.
- Joined
- May 5, 2007
- Messages
- 435
- Age
- 35
- Location
- On the edge of sanity and insanity
- Website
- www.freewebs.com
Agreed.
But yes, he would have a Nobody because he was a Heartless. It would probably just be a Dusk though, probably not very important.
Good point!Nomura indeed did things like that to extent the duration of the game.If you think of it,almost all the bad guys were reborn!Maleficent,Oogie Boogie,Ursula,Jafar (OK, he didn't "reborn",but brought back in the game)....Pretty lame indeed!!
A
Azrael
Guest
If he did have a Heartless, he must have a Nobody...not important. KH2 was the worst in the series certainly
Hows it the worst in the series? It was like the best
No, it was the worst in the series. I think that CoM was the best, and the original is close by, in second.
Anyway, if Scar had a nobody, it would not be anyone important. Just, like a lion-dusk thing.
It doesn't work that way, though.
A Nobody doesn't automatically spawn once a Heartless is created. Only those with strong enough hearts are able to continue as Nobodies. Scar was weak; he let darkness control him, so I'd assume a nobody wasn't created.
That'd make a funny nubody:laugh:
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2008
- Messages
- 445
Kh2 was amazing! I have no idea what you're talking about with CoM being the best. The only good thing about that game was playing as Riku.
Scar's heart wasn't strong enough to have a very powerful Nobody.
Scar's heart wasn't strong enough to have a very powerful Nobody.
Except, CoM had the most character development, and the best gameplay. KH2 was too easy and lacked character development, although the graphics were nice.
Agreed.
Oh come on CoM had the worst gameplay. The deck system sucked. KH1 was the best of all the games so far. KH2 was too easy, but they fixed a lot things that was wrong from the first one. Had the game been more difficult then it be the best. They would have also need to tweak some things with the story, but not a lot. Anyways, no Scar would not have a nobody.
you shouldn't overlook chain of memories. chain of memories didn't had the worst gameplay. what just because it has bad graphics ? you didn't know how to play ? kingdom hearts ii had the worst gameplay. it was unbalanced...
but lets stay back on topic. i think it was a bad idea for scar to have a heartless and also a nobody. i didn't know what square was thinking but it was a bad idea.
but lets stay back on topic. i think it was a bad idea for scar to have a heartless and also a nobody. i didn't know what square was thinking but it was a bad idea.
Hahaha Scar's a weakling. KH2 was too easy because when I fought final form Xemnas I died maybe 5 times(Thats when I first played) at least on the first I died at over 20 times.
i think comfm was the best and plus why couldent scar just have let the darckness consume him like ricku??
the real question should be "do all disney villians in KH have a nobody?" because in the original KH, almost all of sora's "boss battles" has something to do with the bosses turning into heartless.
- Status