yeah, still nothing in common doesn't work well either. we do need a A.5 heheh
Help/Support ► dating consensus
- Thread starter Faris
- Start date
|
REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS |
|
- Status
Exactly my opinion.
physically, i would go eighter way, and something i would have alot in common i would think of things like common interest and ideals, not in personality,
i would date someone with a different personality but most of my interests, and ideals the same.
sometihng in common does work but, when its not everything in common, i mean we are in a site that likes kingdom hearts we all enjoy talking about it, but it does get boring if someone has EVERYTHING in common. so thats why i say its good to have most things in common but not everything
i would date someone with a different personality but most of my interests, and ideals the same.
sometihng in common does work but, when its not everything in common, i mean we are in a site that likes kingdom hearts we all enjoy talking about it, but it does get boring if someone has EVERYTHING in common. so thats why i say its good to have most things in common but not everything
After reading your post in the thread you made in this section I now know why you felt this way. My apologies, Aqua.
Hold on, physically? What are you trying to say?
You care to elaborate on this a bit, Mars?
oh its ok, i forgive u.
i think mars was trying to say he would date someone with opposite sex, i think...
A physical relationship. not quite sure how to put it any other way.
I'd like to try it with a little bit of both. I mean if you date somebody who has too much in common, you wouldn't find a unique difference (well you still could but I hope you get what I mean) and or if you date somebody you don't have too much in common, you'd be at loss with conversation and fighting over stuff but that's not to say that opposite doesn't attract and you can't find somebody who's like the opposite and get along but to me, it's better to date people who have a little bit of both, makes things alot easier.
like someone with alot in common but still have someinterests that are different
or mostly different with some things thata re similar
C
Charlie
Guest
A - The more you have in common; the easier it is to hold a conversation. At the same time, it doesn't really leave /much/ to the imagination. Might as well roam around naked together. Lmao.
A.5 - Balanced. A bit enigmatic + some similarities. This is the route a lot of people usually take when in a relationship.
You can relate to the person, but you can also learn something new about them a bit each day. Good deal, right?
B - Opposites.
At some point - You can see that they have something that you'll need for yourself, personality wise.
Opposites attract, and all that Jazz.
Eh.
I prefer B.
But oddly; I've had..and kinda /am/ dealing with a sickly mixture of all of them at the moment.
A.A.5.B
haha
x]
A.5 - Balanced. A bit enigmatic + some similarities. This is the route a lot of people usually take when in a relationship.
You can relate to the person, but you can also learn something new about them a bit each day. Good deal, right?
B - Opposites.
At some point - You can see that they have something that you'll need for yourself, personality wise.
Opposites attract, and all that Jazz.
Eh.
I prefer B.
But oddly; I've had..and kinda /am/ dealing with a sickly mixture of all of them at the moment.
A.A.5.B
haha
x]
A.5 - just so you could get to know the person better.
alot but not everything, that just be boring i mean she know everything your about to say before you say it and thats not fun
Personally, I go with both.
In regards to having a lot in common with someone, it would end up being someone I have a close platonic tie with in the beginning. Whether it would turn sour or not, I have no idea.
I'd also go with B from personal experience, despite the fact that the relationship I'm basing this on didn't turn out too well. But if I were to date someone I don't have a lot in common with, I would choose someone who is largely detached from the rest of my social life (as in, someone who doesn't have many connections to the other people I'm associated with).
There are pros and cons to both A and B, because in the end, things are dependent on who the person is.
In regards to having a lot in common with someone, it would end up being someone I have a close platonic tie with in the beginning. Whether it would turn sour or not, I have no idea.
I'd also go with B from personal experience, despite the fact that the relationship I'm basing this on didn't turn out too well. But if I were to date someone I don't have a lot in common with, I would choose someone who is largely detached from the rest of my social life (as in, someone who doesn't have many connections to the other people I'm associated with).
There are pros and cons to both A and B, because in the end, things are dependent on who the person is.
its interesting to see what people would do. we need more votes though.
I think if your going to date it is best to just date people among the various ideas presented here to gain experience on how those relationships work out.
In choosing someone you hope to date for a long time I think it is best to date someone you have things in common with, but not a lot of things. By having somethings in common you are able to spark conversations about those topics. Now not in common things are good as well because it allows a couple to express their own opinions to one another. It sort of shows that the person is of their own accord. My girlfriend and I have a lot in common, but there are always those things we disagree on which keeps us sane because being to similar gets weird and could hurt a relationship.
In choosing someone you hope to date for a long time I think it is best to date someone you have things in common with, but not a lot of things. By having somethings in common you are able to spark conversations about those topics. Now not in common things are good as well because it allows a couple to express their own opinions to one another. It sort of shows that the person is of their own accord. My girlfriend and I have a lot in common, but there are always those things we disagree on which keeps us sane because being to similar gets weird and could hurt a relationship.
like i date the people who i have a crush on
and once u get to know them you accept each other how you are
and once u get to know them you accept each other how you are
i like that rebel girl. its really sweet. and totally understandable.
I think it could rerally work with a girl that you have a lot i n common with and you enjoy each other's company. I say this because if you get with a girl that you hardly have anything in common with, there will be nothing that you two can discuss, thus no chance of being able to with hold a stable relationship, let alone a serious relationship with that person. So that is why I'd say get with a girl that you have either something in common or a lot in common.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Messages
- 1,204
Both ways could actually work, in some cases. I mean, it's love. It could be happy or it could be tragic. Who knows? It just all depends...as for me, it's A. 
- Status