- Joined
- Nov 30, 2010
- Messages
- 10
I think I see where you are coming from. The way you are writing it is to assume that the Auditore family have always been in Florence and that Domenico was just the first Assassins to integrate with them and create the first Auditore/Assassin lineage.
However, as written by Domenico: "From that moment forward, I collected treatises on architecture, studied the classics and took vocal lessons. I adopted the name Auditore, impersonating a noble at the Florentine Court. Accepted as one of their own, I took on the trappings of the nobility and constructed this villa for me and my son."
"To the Auditore that reads this, remember that you are not a nobleman. You are not one of the deceivers, you are one of the people."
In the first passage, when Domenico mentions that he impersonated a noble in the Courts, do you take it as him impersonating a specific person at the courts, that being an Auditore? Or do you take it as him adopting the appearance of a noble in general?
In the second passage, if you are to suggest that the Auditore family has been around since before Domenico, then why would he insist on telling that they are not nobleman, when in fact, they are; when in fact, they have a pretty powerful history according to your writing?
The reason this seems to be an issue is because it is suggested that Domenico was the founder of the Auditore banker/assassin clan which would not make sense for there to be an Alessandro Auditore before him unless it was a completely unrelated person with the same name.
Please help me make sense of this.
However, as written by Domenico: "From that moment forward, I collected treatises on architecture, studied the classics and took vocal lessons. I adopted the name Auditore, impersonating a noble at the Florentine Court. Accepted as one of their own, I took on the trappings of the nobility and constructed this villa for me and my son."
"To the Auditore that reads this, remember that you are not a nobleman. You are not one of the deceivers, you are one of the people."
In the first passage, when Domenico mentions that he impersonated a noble in the Courts, do you take it as him impersonating a specific person at the courts, that being an Auditore? Or do you take it as him adopting the appearance of a noble in general?
In the second passage, if you are to suggest that the Auditore family has been around since before Domenico, then why would he insist on telling that they are not nobleman, when in fact, they are; when in fact, they have a pretty powerful history according to your writing?
The reason this seems to be an issue is because it is suggested that Domenico was the founder of the Auditore banker/assassin clan which would not make sense for there to be an Alessandro Auditore before him unless it was a completely unrelated person with the same name.
Please help me make sense of this.