• Hello everybody! We have tons of new awards for the new year that can be requested through our Awards System thanks to Antifa Lockhart! Some are limited-time awards so go claim them before they are gone forever...

    CLICK HERE FOR AWARDS

The true meaning of Darkness x Addiction to the Light



REGISTER TO REMOVE ADS

Noivern

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2019
Messages
421
Awards
6
Age
28
This is something that has been on my mind for quite a while now but I always forgot to make a thread about it.

Darkness, in Kingdom Hearts, is treated as a power of evil and corruption. The Realm of Light is the place where most of the saga takes place, while the Realm of Darkness is a corrupt warzone full of powerful pureblood Heartless that has direct affect on one's heart, as seen with Aqua's time in there, as well as Riku, Mickey and Ansem the Wise.

However, that isn't the only representation of Darkness we got.

Although it's mainly associated with negativeness and bad things, there have been instances where Darkness wasn't treated as something bad but instead as just the opposite of Light. This is mainly seen through Riku, who conquers the Darkness in his heart and becomes the first-know Keyblade Master of Darkness, learning to use it for good without having his heart consumed by it. But Riku isn't the only exemple of this either.

All Nobodies are capable of using the power of Darkness without showing visible signs of corruption: Besides Saïx and Xigbar who were in league with Xehanort all along, all Nobodies seem to be able to use the Corridors of Darkness freely, even Naminé summoned one to help Sora and Co. escape at the end of KH2. They also showed command over weaker Heartless

Then we go over the second topic I'd like to discuss, being the possibility of being addicted to the power of Light.

The first time we hear this is in Birth by Sleep, when Xehanort refeers to Eraqus as such during his attempts to manipulate Terra.

At first, most of us probably didn't think much of it, knowing Xehanort was the villain from the start. But what if he was actually right, to a certain point? Later in the game, Xehanort tells us that the Keyblade War was fought over Kingdom Hearts, something we'd see in more detail in a upcoming game.

The second time this becomes relevant is during the Era of Fairy Tales that we got to know through Chi and Union Chi. There we see everything that happened leading up to THE Keyblade War: Keyblade Wielders from different unions were fighting over Lux; aka, fighting over Light. Of course, the game presents it as the fight over Lux causing people to fall into Darkness, but it's still worthy of mentioning regardless.

Xehanort and Eraqus were written to be equals, something that is more evident in KH3 when the later returns and admits of his wrongdoings before fading with his long-time friend.

Xehanort wasn't obsessed with only Darkness. He was obsessed with power, with knowledge. He was a Scientist just as he was an Adventurer, and he went through unknow lenghts to reach his goals. We don't know where he got all of his information, what was teached at Scala and what he learned elsewhere, but it's VERY important to note that Xehanort was NOT controlled. He actually seemed to always be in full control of himself and his Darkness, not even once risking being consumed by it. For a long time we thought his Heartless was fruit of an accident, but recent games proved us wrong with all evidence leading to him WILLINGLY releasing his Heart so it could go back in time and then later turn into a Heartless to become one more vessel for his future Organization.

Meanwhile, Eraqus seemed to be a conservative to extreme lenghts; He's the heir to the Land of Departure, and a common theory is that he comes from a long line of Keyblade Wielders thanks to Xehanort calling him a blue blood (or was it pureblood?). He was incredibly overprotective of his apprentices to the point where it became a toxic relationship, with him willing to kill Ventus and even Terra. And he seemed to fear the Darkness, more than anyone else. The regret he shows just before he's killed by Terra and then later on when his heart exits the later's Heart at the end of KH3 is identical to the instances we had of someone being freed from the influence of Darkness before, it just lacks the obvious visual hints (Yellow eyes, darkness fading from the body. etc.).

By now, I'd like to present another thing for everyone to consider. I talked about this recently in another thread about the return of Dual Wielding Sora in KH3 and I might make a thread about this later for further discussion.

Most of the information we have about the world of Kingdom Hearts that is present in the games themselves was obtained through ambiguous sources: EVERYTHING presented in the reports in all games is character-based. Aka, it's knowledge from a specific character point of view, and NOT Nomura and the team itself.
What that means is that the information presented in the KH universe is mostly through their own dubious form of science: most sources of what we know and understand about the Darkness, the Light, the Keyblade, etc.. comes from a combination of experience x experiments. The reports from KH1, for example, are from Terranorth/Ansem SoD/Xehanort's experimentations with the Heart, not Nomura himself stating how it works.
That obviously doesn't mean that it's false or necessarily incorrect, don't get me wrong. Just that it's not the full truth and retcons have happened before and can happen again.

I'm NOT saying Darkness is just misinterpreted and is actually good or anything. Just that there may be more to it than just = evil, and that may be key to the future of the franchise going forward, and I think it could present some interesting discussions.

With all of that out of the way, I'd like to discuss with everyone your thoughts on this matter.

1. Do you believe that it's possible to be addicted and thus corrupted by the Light, or is Eraqus just a very specific case?

2. Do you think it's possible to explore Darkness in a positive way as the counterpart of Light in the future like Riku does, or he's going to be the sole exception of this?

3. Terra was addept to using Darkness by his own, without Xehanort's influence. He was responsible for leading him towards that path, but Terra first used it on his own. Eraqus reproved him as a Master because of that, and although we didn't really see much of Terra before BBS started, he didn't seem to have any actual negative qualities of his own before the journey started, and even then I'd argue that the Darkness he used in the exam came from his wish to protect the others, so it might just been a case of him having a natural affinity to it. What are your thoughts on that? Do you think he might actually explore this in the future now that he's back and in control again, like Riku did?
 

AdrianXXII

Dyslexic rambler
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
2,989
Awards
15
Location
Switzerland
As @Sephiroth0812 stated in another thread, we've actually had other examples of good darkness beings before. The Dream eaters in the realm of Sleep are creatures of Darkness, yet the Spirits are kind, playful and nice. Though some like Chirithy do seem to have some additude haha.

I personally wouldn't mind seeing more good beings affiliated with Darkness or Light based bad guys so blinded by light that they do awful things.

Spoiler Spoiler Show
 

Noivern

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2019
Messages
421
Awards
6
Age
28
As @Sephiroth0812 stated in another thread, we've actually had other examples of good darkness beings before. The Dream eaters in the realm of Sleep are creatures of Darkness, yet the Spirits are kind, playful and nice. Though some like Chirithy do seem to have some additude haha.

I personally wouldn't mind seeing more good beings affiliated with Darkness or Light based bad guys so blinded by light that they do awful things.

Spoiler Spoiler Show

Oh wow, I kinda forgot about this thread since it was engulfed with the flood of returning forumers and new threads with the DLC dropping in.

I forgot that bit about the Dream Eaters! I rushed through 3D with such fury that I lost all of the smaller details like this one.

Spoiler Spoiler Show
 

OneDandelion

Active member
Joined
Dec 14, 2018
Messages
351
Awards
2
I'm not sure how deeply you want to dive into this topic but this is actually something I've thought about for a long time, and not just with respect to Kingdom Hearts but how it applies in real life. If I had seen this thread earlier I would have replied, sorry about that.

The "light" in Kingdom Hearts is demonstrated to be everything that is "good" in the world whereas the "darkness" is somewhat shallowly defined as the opposite. This idea is actually a bit more relevant in the west than in Japan because our perspectives are heavily defined by Christianity which is very close to the way light and darkness are perceived in Kingdom Hearts (ie. be a good person and you'll be happy/bathe in the light of heaven, be a bad person you'll fall to darkness and go to hell). Within Christianity a fairly hot topic of debate is on free will - the necessity of the existence of evil for us to be capable of good, and the value of choice; and that is probably what most westerners think when they think of "darkness" vs "light" in KH - and in my opinion I think there is value to this idea but I don't think it's the whole story.

More recently with the reveal of the Master of Master's it is revealed that Kingdom Hearts (as it exists now) won't necessarily always be around and that the struggle between light and darkness is fated to last forever - the Master of Master's does not desire to get rid of darkness and his stated goal is to merely stop the fighting for a little while so he can rest. If we can believe what the Master of Master's says to be the case then it is somewhat safe to say that the light and darkness are both merely things to be used by people with hearts and that it doesn't really matter whether they choose one or the other. Or to put it another way, it's alright to use both as long as you don't fall victim or become dependent on either. This way of thinking is closer to stoicism or the Bushido religion of the Samurai which somewhat allowed people to morally "stray from their path" as long as they didn't stray so far that they can't find their way back.

Personally I think the Bushido interpretation is closer to the truth. The problem with the Light (and Xehanort alludes to this) is that it's highly addictive, easily manipulated, and while bathing in it's comforting warmth has a tendency to make us so weak that we may no longer want to acknowledge that darkness even exists within us and as a result we fear it. The problem with the darkness is that it can be so vast and overwhelming that we may lose ourselves to it entirely if we face it unprepared.

Xehanort says: "all around the world, people live seemingly peaceful lives. They believe themselves to be moral and virtuous, but it's all an act. Darkness lurks in the pit of everyone's heart. Their light is a total farce." How true do you believe this to be with respect to the real world? If you live in America how often do you see people making fun of each other for differing political and religious views, propping themselves up on a pedestal to seem intelligent and virtuous all the while not actually making a difference. People are addicted to the comfort of their smartphones and want to pretend like they're incapable of being evil, while telling themselves anyone who commits an atrocity did so out of insanity - forces beyond any "normal" person's control. These kinds of people are weak because they've been bathing in the warmth of "light" so long that they can no longer fathom that they are capable of "darkness", and because they have no way of comparing their 'light' with respect to their 'darkness' they're easily manipulated as they can't tell what "light" is real and what's fake.

I don't mean to make this a serious philosophical discussion, but I do believe that it's necessary to dive deeply into the subject if you want a serious answer. And to do that it is somewhat necessary to draw out the real world parallels and implications. But to answer your specific questions:

1. I don't know if Eraqus actuallly was corrupted by the light or if it's merely something Xehanort said. It could be the Eraqus kept his darkness and light in check but had an affinity for using the light when it came to his own power. Perhaps he also feared the power of darkness and surely that would limit his strength but I don't think that is completely an indicator that he was corrupted by the light.
2. I do think it's possible to explore that Darkness in a positive light, but I'm not sure how possible it is for most people to interpret it as a good thing because it seems to me most of the audience of KH views darkness with that evil stigma. But to their credit, it's the framework they grew up with. Maybe Nomura can explore this concept in a way that people can understand, but I think it would be very difficult.
3. I do hope that they come back to this idea in future games, and if they explore the theme of darkness as a "good" thing then I'm sure it would be necessary to elaborate on Terra and Riku's individual use of darkness.
 
Back
Top