Please go develop a fundamental understanding of the Big Bang before you attempt to refute it.
If we're going to accept the hypothesis that things are capable of just coming into existence without any definitive cause, I think it makes more sense to pose it that massive amounts of elemental matter spontaneously occurred as opposed to a fully conscious, omnipotent being. That being said, why is it such a terrible thing that the origins of the universe are unexplainable yet you don't hold the idea of an intelligent designer up to that same level of scrutiny?
If we're going to accept the hypothesis that things are capable of just coming into existence without any definitive cause, I think it makes more sense to pose it that massive amounts of elemental matter spontaneously occurred as opposed to a fully conscious, omnipotent being. That being said, why is it such a terrible thing that the origins of the universe are unexplainable yet you don't hold the idea of an intelligent designer up to that same level of scrutiny?